So when the came in this morning it turned out there was an open slot today at two thirty, which is somewhat different than the previous estimate of "maybe August" for when I could have an exam.
So now I've had my eyes checked which hopefully is covered by insurance but I remember them being wrong about that once before way back when I was still covered by my mother's insurance. Good news: I don't have (a specific type of) cancer or diabetes.
Diabetes runs in both sides of my family, so I knew that was a risk, I didn't even remember the fact that there's apparently a mole in the back of my right eye that needs to be watched for fear it'll do the whole "I'm going to grow out of control now" that changes a growth from "mole" to "cancer. It hasn't grown in the six years since my last eye exam, I think I'm good.
Those and other things are why I had my pupils dilated, my retina photographed and looked at, and so much light shined into my eyes that I couldn't really tell dark from light but I could sure as fuck see every god damned blood vessel in my retina in crystal clarity. I'm honestly not sure exactly how that works, but something about shining a bright light in your eye allows you to see the inside of your eye.
While not having cancer and not having diabetes and not having [random other thing that sounds like badly written technobabble to me] are all good things, I didn't actually go there for any of that crap.
My eyes are actually continuing to improve, if you ignore the scratches and scuffs and such, the problem lenses in my glasses is that they're too strong. And back when I got then-new glasses six years ago, that was also (albeit at a lower level) the problem with these glasses. If I keep this up then after I die of old age (optimism here), get buried, and rise from the dead as part of the zombie apocalypse, my unaided vision might be normal or better.
Now wearing glasses that are too strong isn't a good thing, but in this case it isn't a horrible thing either. The scratches that mar the surfaces of the lenses are a much bigger pain. Still, even without scratches I'd be better off with the right prescription.
Fun fact: while my insurance covers getting my eyes checked out (though I have worries that it might not cover the detailed retina thing which would be bad) it doesn't help at all when it comes to frames or lenses.
If I want good glasses I need both. These frames are beat to Hell. (They've been crushed at least once.)
Now I have no idea how the fuck one reasons "We should allow people to get their eyes checked to see if they need glasses and then not let them get the glasses they find out they need," but such is life. It also doesn't cover non-emergency dental even though it's much cheaper to not wait for an emergency and so not have one. (Amoung my hopes and dreams is getting my teeth checked and cleaned by a professional.) So I'm used to things not making sense.
The lenses cost 99 dollars, for an additional 89 they can be made non-glare, which I give no shits about, that has the side effect of making both sides of the lenses scratch resistant, which I give acres of fertilizer about. (Standard lenses are only scratch resistant on the outward facing side based upon the theory that glasses will, once donned, create an eternal airtight bond with your face thus preventing any possible abrasions while wearing and preventing them from ever being not-worn.)
The frames . . . here's the thing, I know exactly what I like in glasses. It's consistent and simple. It and popularity don't exactly go hand in hand.
In fact, I couldn't find anything. The actual glasses guy (entirely different than the eye doctor since glasses and eyes have very little in common and it would be silly to expect someone to specialize in both fields) had to search through his entire inventory, including the stuff that doesn't get anything like it displayed because, seriously, what are the odds?
Out of everything he has access to, he found one frame that matches what I wear. Two if you count: I don't even look like myself because frame free glasses have achieved invisibility, and anyway, it's more expensive.
One style, two colors, such wonderful selection. But actually, it worked out. The style is perfect, and either of the colors would have been fine, but there's one I like more so that works out to a simple decision when it comes to aesthetics.
$219
But wait, I could take my prescription to a different place and they'd . . . nope. The internet informs me that not only will I not be finding a cheaper option, but that glasses manufacturers in general, and frame creators in particular, have no idea what the fuck the word "oval" means.
I does not fucking mean "Rectangle with the corners slightly rounded." No, no, fuck you, no.
Now I get that for some ungodly reason ovals are not popular, in point of fact the actual oval lens and frame glasses the guy did find appear to be trying to evoke a "retro stylings from the the 1900s" feel, but that does not change the fact that a rectangle with the points removed does not an oval make.
Oval is a loosely defined term and can cover everything from an egg shape (from which the word derives) to an ellipse (which is what I go for in my glasses), but it doesn't cover "clearly four sided figure, but shaved some around the corners and/or edges". In the field of athletics it can also mean a figure with two (really fucking straight) sides which are connected by two semi-circles, but even that really-stretching-it meaning doesn't cover the bullshit frame makers are trying to pass off as ovals.
Words mean things, people. For fuck's sake.
So, in conclusion, $99 for lenses, which becomes $188 if I want them to resist abrasion. And if I want them to be things I don't hate, the frames make it add up to $407. Presumably there's some kind of tax, but I'm not even sure what category a medical device falls under.
And I'm already in deep debt, and I owe the insurance, which --if it hasn't changed-- is $267.50 according to a Google search of what I've said before, and quarterly property tax ($657.72) comes due in August, which I obviously haven't saved up for.
So, yeah. I've got a new prescription, there's a decent chance I'm not going to be getting new glasses because: holy fuck; the price.
So now I've had my eyes checked which hopefully is covered by insurance but I remember them being wrong about that once before way back when I was still covered by my mother's insurance. Good news: I don't have (a specific type of) cancer or diabetes.
Diabetes runs in both sides of my family, so I knew that was a risk, I didn't even remember the fact that there's apparently a mole in the back of my right eye that needs to be watched for fear it'll do the whole "I'm going to grow out of control now" that changes a growth from "mole" to "cancer. It hasn't grown in the six years since my last eye exam, I think I'm good.
Those and other things are why I had my pupils dilated, my retina photographed and looked at, and so much light shined into my eyes that I couldn't really tell dark from light but I could sure as fuck see every god damned blood vessel in my retina in crystal clarity. I'm honestly not sure exactly how that works, but something about shining a bright light in your eye allows you to see the inside of your eye.
While not having cancer and not having diabetes and not having [random other thing that sounds like badly written technobabble to me] are all good things, I didn't actually go there for any of that crap.
My eyes are actually continuing to improve, if you ignore the scratches and scuffs and such, the problem lenses in my glasses is that they're too strong. And back when I got then-new glasses six years ago, that was also (albeit at a lower level) the problem with these glasses. If I keep this up then after I die of old age (optimism here), get buried, and rise from the dead as part of the zombie apocalypse, my unaided vision might be normal or better.
Now wearing glasses that are too strong isn't a good thing, but in this case it isn't a horrible thing either. The scratches that mar the surfaces of the lenses are a much bigger pain. Still, even without scratches I'd be better off with the right prescription.
Fun fact: while my insurance covers getting my eyes checked out (though I have worries that it might not cover the detailed retina thing which would be bad) it doesn't help at all when it comes to frames or lenses.
If I want good glasses I need both. These frames are beat to Hell. (They've been crushed at least once.)
Now I have no idea how the fuck one reasons "We should allow people to get their eyes checked to see if they need glasses and then not let them get the glasses they find out they need," but such is life. It also doesn't cover non-emergency dental even though it's much cheaper to not wait for an emergency and so not have one. (Amoung my hopes and dreams is getting my teeth checked and cleaned by a professional.) So I'm used to things not making sense.
The lenses cost 99 dollars, for an additional 89 they can be made non-glare, which I give no shits about, that has the side effect of making both sides of the lenses scratch resistant, which I give acres of fertilizer about. (Standard lenses are only scratch resistant on the outward facing side based upon the theory that glasses will, once donned, create an eternal airtight bond with your face thus preventing any possible abrasions while wearing and preventing them from ever being not-worn.)
The frames . . . here's the thing, I know exactly what I like in glasses. It's consistent and simple. It and popularity don't exactly go hand in hand.
In fact, I couldn't find anything. The actual glasses guy (entirely different than the eye doctor since glasses and eyes have very little in common and it would be silly to expect someone to specialize in both fields) had to search through his entire inventory, including the stuff that doesn't get anything like it displayed because, seriously, what are the odds?
Out of everything he has access to, he found one frame that matches what I wear. Two if you count: I don't even look like myself because frame free glasses have achieved invisibility, and anyway, it's more expensive.
One style, two colors, such wonderful selection. But actually, it worked out. The style is perfect, and either of the colors would have been fine, but there's one I like more so that works out to a simple decision when it comes to aesthetics.
$219
But wait, I could take my prescription to a different place and they'd . . . nope. The internet informs me that not only will I not be finding a cheaper option, but that glasses manufacturers in general, and frame creators in particular, have no idea what the fuck the word "oval" means.
I does not fucking mean "Rectangle with the corners slightly rounded." No, no, fuck you, no.
Now I get that for some ungodly reason ovals are not popular, in point of fact the actual oval lens and frame glasses the guy did find appear to be trying to evoke a "retro stylings from the the 1900s" feel, but that does not change the fact that a rectangle with the points removed does not an oval make.
Oval is a loosely defined term and can cover everything from an egg shape (from which the word derives) to an ellipse (which is what I go for in my glasses), but it doesn't cover "clearly four sided figure, but shaved some around the corners and/or edges". In the field of athletics it can also mean a figure with two (really fucking straight) sides which are connected by two semi-circles, but even that really-stretching-it meaning doesn't cover the bullshit frame makers are trying to pass off as ovals.
Words mean things, people. For fuck's sake.
* * *
So, in conclusion, $99 for lenses, which becomes $188 if I want them to resist abrasion. And if I want them to be things I don't hate, the frames make it add up to $407. Presumably there's some kind of tax, but I'm not even sure what category a medical device falls under.
And I'm already in deep debt, and I owe the insurance, which --if it hasn't changed-- is $267.50 according to a Google search of what I've said before, and quarterly property tax ($657.72) comes due in August, which I obviously haven't saved up for.
So, yeah. I've got a new prescription, there's a decent chance I'm not going to be getting new glasses because: holy fuck; the price.
Chris, did you look at Zenni Optical? Much less expensive than most places, and I've gotten decent results from them.
ReplyDelete