tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3889388775673754833.post7558503462475344809..comments2024-02-24T03:34:18.060-05:00Comments on Stealing Commas: Invisible and Pinkchris the cynichttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06872875475212333027noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3889388775673754833.post-1617863835031261512014-02-27T10:05:16.249-05:002014-02-27T10:05:16.249-05:00Belatedly (I found your blog via the epistemologic...Belatedly (I found your blog via the epistemological synecdoche post Fred Clark linked, and came back again to read your Edith & Ben stories, and then again to see what else you had posted):<br /><br />I think my definition of "invisible" implies the described cannot be seen under <em>many</em> contexts - and so the reason why "clear" is such a popular conception is because clear air exists in many contexts.<br /><br />That still doesn't make "invisible pink" a logical contradiction, of course. My definition would include "physically perceptible, but magically unnoticeable", for example.Packbathttp://packbat.net/w/noreply@blogger.com